Two and a half hours. No theory dumps. We show you how AI fits into a contractor's day, how the platforms differ, how to prompt them so they actually help, and where it pays off in masonry.
I'm Brennan Gerle. I run POLR AI here in Phoenix. What I do every week is sit down with AEC and commercial real estate leadership teams and figure out where AI actually pays off in their operations.
Not the hype version. The version that shows up in fewer admin hours, faster bid turnarounds, and cleaner handoffs to the field. I built this session specifically for the masonry and block side of construction because the work has a different rhythm than commercial GC or design work, and most AI training out there is not going to land for you. The goal today: leave with practical things you can use Monday morning.
I sent a survey before today. The numbers below are pre-filled from your responses. If you didn't fill out the survey, raise your hand for the level you're at and we'll add it live. Click the plus and minus buttons to adjust as the room shows hands.
AI doesn't actually know anything. It learned by reading billions of pages from the internet, and now it predicts what words should come next based on what it's seen before. That's it. That's why how you ask matters so much, and that's why it sometimes makes things up while sounding totally confident. The good news: once you understand that, you can use it really well.
Click any card to flip and see more →
| Year | What was measured | Adoption | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | GCs using or evaluating AI for precon and PM | 34% | |
| 2024 | Construction firms using AI or planning to invest | 44% | |
| 2025 | Construction firms using AI or planning to invest | 61% | |
| 2025 | GCs using or evaluating AI for precon and PM | 67% | |
| 2026 | Project professionals reporting AI used on projects | 75% |
Sources: AGC, Construction Dive, Construction Owners. Compiled May 2026.
This isn't new and scary. It's running quietly in the tools you already pay for. The masonry-specific ones are first. Click any card to expand.
Specialty tools like Beam AI and Togal are great. But before you spend $300 a month per estimator, try the free version of what they do inside ChatGPT or Claude. Most of you can get 70% of the value with $0 and ten minutes of practice.
$20 a month gets you better privacy defaults, longer document handling, faster models, and (on most platforms) terms that say your conversations don't go into model training. The free version is fine to learn on. The paid version is what you should be on once you're putting real client info in.
All the major AI platforms work roughly the same way. Hover over each numbered area to see what that part of the interface does, and how the five platforms compare on it.
Each zone explains what that part of the chat interface does, and how the five major platforms compare.
Tip: the interfaces look almost identical across platforms. The differences are in what's available behind each section.
| Capability | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Perplexity | Copilot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid plan / month | $20 | $20 | $20 | $20 | $30 |
| Recommended model | GPT-5 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Sonar / Auto | GPT-5 (in M365) |
| Projects / Spaces | Yes (Projects) | Yes (Projects) | NotebookLM (separate) | Yes (Spaces) | Limited |
| Custom assistants | Custom GPTs | Skills | Gems | Collections | Copilot Studio agents |
| Built-in coding sandbox | Yes | Yes (Code) | Yes | Limited | Yes (in IDEs) |
| Files / docs in chat | Yes | Yes (Cowork) | Yes | Yes | Native to M365 |
| Trains on your data by default | Yes, turn off | No | Yes, review | Yes, toggle off | No (Enterprise) |
| Where to turn it off | Settings → Data Controls → Improve the model | Already off; opt-in only | Activity → Apps Activity | Settings → AI Data Usage | Already off in M365 commercial |
Pick one platform to learn deeply. Borrow the others when you need them. The first thing to do on day one of any platform: turn off training on your data if it's on by default.
Pick a scenario. Toggle between a basic prompt, a slightly more detailed one, and a CRIT prompt. Watch how the answer transforms when you give the AI Context, a Role, the chance to Interview you back, and a clear Task.
Type into each box for a real situation you're carrying. The fields turn green as they get specific enough. When the meter says ready, copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or whatever you use.
Who you are, what you're dealing with, what's at stake. Names, numbers, dates make it real.
Who you want the AI to be. Years, specialty, the lens to bring.
This is the secret ingredient. Locked in for you so you can focus on the rest.
What the AI should produce after the interview. Be specific about format and deliverables.
Fill in the fields above. Your assembled CRIT prompt will appear here, ready to paste into ChatGPT, Claude, or your platform of choice.
You just learned the framework. Now let's apply it to the #1 ask from your survey: bid leveling. We have a fake school addition project with a scope and three real bids in three different formats sitting in a folder ready to go. We'll spend five minutes running CRIT against it together.
00_Scope_of_Work_RFP.xlsx, 01_Bid_DesertMasonry.pdf, 02_Bid_PhoenixBlockworks.docx, and 03_Bid_SonoranStoneAndBlock.xlsx. The third bid is the lowball with multiple silent exclusions. That's the punchline. Use these to demo the same exercise in Cowork after the break (Section 07 has the full Cowork prompt).
Scheduling, bids, and marketing. Three workflows where AI turns a few hours of work into ten minutes, and where the output is good enough to use, not just look at. Click through the tabs.
None of these replace your judgment. They get you to a working draft fast. You still review, edit, and own the output.
Pre-built prompts for the situations you'll face this week. Click a card to see the full prompt. Each prompt is editable, so you can paste in your own job details, names, or numbers right here, then copy or test it live. Click "Reset to original" any time you want to start over.
I have all 14 of these prompts in a printable PDF and editable markdown. Send the link to your team or hand it out at training. Email me at bg@polrai.com to grab a copy.
AI is great at speed. It is dangerous at codes, specs, and standards if you trust it without verifying. Session 2 is the safe-research playbook. Here's the preview.
"Where did you find this? Provide the references."
Add this to any AI answer that touches a code, spec, or standard. If the AI can't show you the source, treat the answer as a hypothesis, not a fact.
The biggest mistake people make is trying to roll out AI across the company on day one. The firms winning with AI are running small, low-risk pilots and growing what works.
AI sounds confident even when it's wrong. Don't paste confidential project info, client data, or anything you wouldn't want in a public doc. Don't trust AI on codes, specs, or compliance without verifying the source. Human review stays your job. Session 2 of this series goes deep on safe research and verification, that's the right place to take code questions.
Click any question on the left, the answer appears on the right. These are the questions every contractor in every session asks.
Real movement comes from working through your specific situation. One-on-one or with your team. Pick whichever fits where you are.