Connectors, MCP, plugins. What is what.
Three words get used interchangeably and they are not the same. Fifteen minutes to fix the mental model.
Three things, one job
- Connector. An integration to a SaaS app (Gmail, Calendar, Drive, HubSpot, QuickBooks, Slack). Anthropic ships them. You authorize once. Scoped to that account.
- MCP server. A small program (yours or someone else's) that exposes a tool or data source over the Model Context Protocol. The standard a custom integration speaks.
- Plugin. A packaged set of MCP servers, prompts, and Skills shipped together. What you install when someone hands you a working setup.
The privacy posture
Connectors are scoped, not all access. You authorize per app, with the same scopes you would grant a coworker. Treat the decision the same way. Who do you give the keys to, and which keys.
Gmail, Calendar, and Drive.
The three connectors that change the morning routine. Twenty minutes to authorize, scope, and run your first cross-tool brief.
Authorize and scope
The daily morning brief
The first cross-tool query worth running every day. It compounds because it compounds your attention.
HubSpot, QuickBooks, Slack, Procore.
The four tools where the rest of the work lives. CRM, finance, team chat, project management. Each one has a sharper authorization conversation than the first three.
HubSpot and QuickBooks
The pipeline-to-cash loop. HubSpot tells Claude what is moving through the funnel. QuickBooks tells Claude what has actually been billed and collected. Together they answer the question every principal asks at the end of the month.
- Read access to QuickBooks is enough for 95 percent of useful queries. Money movement scopes stay off, always.
- HubSpot scopes can be limited to specific pipelines. Use that. The principal does not need Claude reading HR records.
Slack and Procore (via integration)
Slack search becomes useful the moment Claude can read the right channels. Pick channels. Do not authorize all-channel access on day one.
Procore is in flux. There is no first-party Anthropic Connector for Procore at this writing [needs source for current state]. Useful patterns today are an MCP server pointed at a Procore data export, or a Zapier-style integration that pushes the fields the firm cares about into a Drive folder Claude already reads.
Three AEC use cases
The patterns where cross-tool reach pays back fastest.
Custom MCP servers and the plugins ecosystem.
When the off-the-shelf Connectors do not reach what the firm cares about, MCP is the answer. Honest about when to build, when to buy, and when to wait.
When a custom MCP server is worth it
- The data lives in a tool with no Connector and no plugin (Sage 300, Vista, a homegrown project tracker).
- The tool ships an API. Not a CSV export, not a screen scrape. An API.
- The query the firm wants to run lives in there at least weekly.
Two of three is the threshold. One of three is a project for next year.
Evaluating a plugin
- Who wrote it. A real maintainer matters more than star count.
- What it reads and writes. Read the README, then read the code.
- How it handles secrets. If the answer is unclear, do not install it.
Governance for a 50 person firm.
The grown-up part. Who can authorize what. How to revoke. How to audit. A posture you can defend to the owner when they ask why Claude has access to their email.
The four roles
- Owner. Decides which tools are eligible at all. Sets the firm policy.
- Admin. Authorizes connectors at the org level. Reviews scopes quarterly.
- User. Authorizes their own account on the tools the firm has approved. Cannot grant scopes the firm has not.
- Auditor. Reviews access logs on a schedule. The CFO or the IT lead, named.
Revocation drill
What to read next
- Getting Started with Claude Code: when an integration does not exist, sometimes the right move is to build the small tool yourself.
- Getting Started with Claude Skills: the Skills you build on top of these connectors are where the leverage compounds.